Contact your Senators and Representative—all at once, in one easy step:
📬 Use or personalize the Action Letter below, then click here to send it.
(Powered by Democracy.io, a nonpartisan tool by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.)
To contact the Office of the President, click here.
Subject: Urgent Request to Investigate Political Security Clearance Revocations
Dear [Recipient],
I am writing to express my deep concern over the recent revocation of security clearances for former high-ranking civil servants, including General Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Secretary Antony Blinken. These actions have raised significant concerns about the potential political motivations behind the revocations, which could undermine the integrity of the federal civil service and erode key democratic principles.
The revocation of security clearances is typically reserved for national security matters. However, when such decisions are made based on political considerations rather than legitimate security concerns, they risk compromising the impartiality and effectiveness of our government institutions. Specifically, I am concerned that the actions taken by the Trump Administration to revoke clearances for individuals who have disagreed with its policies or taken actions perceived as contrary to the administration's agenda may be influenced by political motivations.
Key Concerns:
Political Retaliation and Civil Service Integrity:
The dismissals of individuals such as General Milley, Dr. Fauci, and Secretary Blinken suggest an alarming pattern of political retaliation. These officials held positions of critical importance in areas such as national security, public health, and foreign diplomacy, and their actions were intended to serve the public interest, not the political interests of any administration.
Legal and Constitutional Protections:
Federal employees, including former civil servants, are entitled to protections against political retaliation, as outlined under 5 U.S. Code § 2302. The decision to revoke security clearances based on political disagreement may violate these protections and undermine the principles of government neutrality that are essential for maintaining the trust and effectiveness of our institutions.
National Security Implications:
The removal of security clearances for individuals with valuable expertise could weaken the effectiveness of federal agencies. These actions could create uncertainty within the government workforce and harm the ability of future administrations to benefit from the experience and knowledge of individuals with the necessary clearances.
Request for Action:
I urge you to take immediate action to investigate these security clearance revocations and ensure that they were not motivated by political retribution. There should be transparency in the process of revoking security clearances, with clear justification based on national security interests rather than personal or political agendas. The public deserves to know whether these actions align with the constitutional and legal protections designed to prevent political interference in the civil service.
It is crucial that we protect the integrity of our civil service and prevent the politicization of the federal workforce. I respectfully request that you advocate for a thorough investigation into the rationale behind these clearance revocations and take steps to ensure that such actions do not undermine the effectiveness and neutrality of our government.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Backgrounder
Backgrounder: Concerns About Revoked Security Clearances for Former Civil Servants
In recent actions by the Trump Administration, former federal civil servants such as General Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Secretary Antony Blinken have had their security clearances revoked. These actions have raised concerns about potential political retribution and the risk of undermining civil service protections.
Civil Service Protections for Former Employees
Federal civil service protections are designed to ensure that employees are treated fairly, free from discrimination, and can perform their duties without undue political influence. While some protections remain for former civil servants, these are more limited than those available to current employees.
Due Process and Political Retaliation: Under U.S. law, federal employees are protected from retaliation for their political views, public statements, or whistleblower activities, including former federal employees. Revoking security clearances based on political disagreements or retaliation for actions taken while in office can be seen as a violation of these protections.
Under 5 U.S. Code § 2302, former employees can challenge actions perceived to be politically motivated, such as the revocation of their security clearances if the decision is linked to their First Amendment rights or their exercise of free speech during government service (including publicly disagreeing with the administration).
Security Clearance Revocation and Potential Political Retaliation
While security clearances can be revoked for legitimate national security reasons, the recent revocations of those held by Milley, Fauci, Blinken, and other former officials have raised questions about whether the motivations behind these actions are politically driven. Concerns are particularly heightened when such revocations are perceived to be in retaliation for these individuals' professional conduct or political disagreements while serving in office.
Milley publicly disagreed with President Trump’s handling of military matters, particularly during the Black Lives Matter protests and the Capitol insurrection.
Fauci clashed with President Trump on public health responses throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Blinken, as Secretary of State, advocated for foreign policy approaches that diverged from President Trump’s positions.
These actions appear to depart from historical norms in which the federal government, especially its civil servants, is expected to maintain neutrality, particularly in areas like military leadership and public health.
The Legal Framework for Civil Service Protections
5 U.S. Code § 2302:
This section protects federal employees from retaliation for disclosing government wrongdoing and provides a basis for former federal employees to contest decisions if they are politically motivated.
Whistleblower Protection Act:
Employees reporting violations of law or engaging in protected activities such as providing truthful information about potential violations cannot face retaliation. This includes former employees, who may still be protected under this statute in cases of retaliatory firings or security clearance revocations.
Potential Consequences of Political Retaliation
The revocation of security clearances without valid, national security-related reasons can have several consequences:
Undermining trust in the civil service and damaging the federal government’s ability to attract qualified, impartial employees.
Setting a dangerous precedent where political retribution becomes normalized, with officials facing punishment for expressing their First Amendment rights or performing their professional duties.
Eroding institutional independence, potentially weakening democratic governance by turning key federal roles into political appointments.
Conclusion
The revocation of security clearances for high-ranking officials such as Milley, Fauci, and Blinken raises serious concerns about the potential politicization of federal institutions and the safeguarding of civil service protections. While federal employees can be dismissed or have clearances revoked for valid national security reasons, when these actions appear politically motivated, they could violate civil service laws and First Amendment protections, undermining public trust and the integrity of government institutions.
Revoking security clearances should never be used as a tool for political retribution. These actions have long-term consequences for the health of the federal workforce and the stability of U.S. democratic institutions.
Citations:
5 U.S. Code § 2302 – Legal protections for federal employees against retaliation for protected activities, including whistleblowing and political activity. Source
Whistleblower Protection Act – Protections for federal employees reporting violations of law. Source
“Trump’s Firing of Milley and Other Officials Raises Concerns About Political Reprisals” – The Atlantic, February 2025. Source
“Why We Should Be Concerned About Security Clearance Revocations” – The New York Times, January 2025. Source