Protect the Rights of Immigrants Detained at Guantanamo Bay

​

Introduction: In early February 2025, the Trump administration began transferring undocumented immigrants, including some alleged members of violent gangs, to the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The facility, historically known for holding suspected terrorists and enemy combatants, has now been used to detain individuals crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally. Disturbingly, reports have revealed that the transfers are not limited to those with violent criminal histories or gang affiliations.

 

The administration has also sent "low-risk" migrants—undocumented individuals who lack serious criminal records or have only civil immigration violations—to Guantanamo, where they face indefinite detention without clear charges or access to legal counsel. These actions have raised serious concerns regarding the violation of constitutional rights, due process, international law, and transparency. The transfer of immigrants to Guantanamo has drawn strong legal challenges, including from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which argues that such actions violate basic human rights and constitutional protections.

​

The Use of Guantanamo Bay for Immigrant Detention

In February 2025, the Trump administration intensified its efforts to deport undocumented immigrants by utilizing the Guantanamo Bay detention center, a facility most associated with the detention of suspected terrorists. While the government claims that Guantanamo is being used to detain the "worst of the worst" individuals, including violent criminals and gang members, an increasing number of reports have emerged suggesting that low-risk, non-violent immigrants are also being held there (ProPublica, 2025). Among the detainees are those accused of minor infractions or civil immigration violations, including individuals who crossed the border without proper documentation but have no criminal convictions or ties to violent groups (CBS News, 2025).

​

These detainees, who have often been in detention awaiting deportation, now face indefinite incarceration at Guantanamo without access to legal representation. The administration has suggested that Guantanamo's use for immigrant detention is necessary to address "high-priority criminal aliens" and to alleviate overcrowding in other detention facilities. However, many immigration advocates, including the ACLU, have raised alarms about this move, which they argue undermines due process and violates both national and international laws regarding the treatment of detainees (ProPublica, 2025).

​

Concerns Over Constitutional Rights and Transparency

The decision to send immigrants to Guantanamo Bay has sparked widespread concern about human rights violations, particularly the lack of transparency surrounding the detainees' identities, their criminal records, and the nature of the evidence against them. As of early February 2025, the names of the detainees have not been publicly disclosed, and the government has failed to provide details about the crimes they allegedly committed (ProPublica, 2025). This lack of transparency fuels suspicions that non-violent individuals are being detained without cause, simply because they have entered the U.S. without proper authorization.

​

Additionally, the administration's decision to house individuals in Guantanamo, a facility outside of the United States legal system, raises grave concerns about the denial of constitutional protections. The ACLU and other advocacy groups argue that detainees should have access to legal counsel and the ability to challenge their detention in court. By holding detainees incommunicado at Guantanamo, the administration effectively removes them from the protections of U.S. law, making it difficult for lawyers or family members to know their whereabouts or status (ACLU, 2025).

​

The Legal Challenge

The ACLU has filed a lawsuit, challenging the administration’s use of Guantanamo Bay to detain undocumented immigrants. The lawsuit claims that the U.S. government is violating constitutional rights by denying detainees access to attorneys and the ability to challenge their detention (ProPublica, 2025). ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt stated, “Never before have people been taken from U.S. soil and sent to Guantanamo, and then denied access to lawyers and the outside world. It is difficult to think of anything so flagrantly at odds with the fundamental principles on which our country was built” (ProPublica, 2025).

​

The U.S. government's refusal to provide names or details about the detainees—combined with the location of their detention in a high-security military facility—has led to calls from human rights groups for greater oversight and accountability. Critics argue that the use of Guantanamo as an immigrant detention site reflects a broader trend of using extreme measures to deter immigration and remove people from the U.S., regardless of their criminal backgrounds.

​

The Role of Guantanamo in the Broader Immigration Strategy

The Trump administration's use of Guantanamo for immigration detention is part of a broader strategy to aggressively enforce immigration laws and remove undocumented individuals from the United States. Along with using Guantanamo, the administration has implemented large-scale raids across the country, arresting thousands of undocumented individuals, many of whom have minor or non-violent criminal records. According to internal government documents and CBS News, federal immigration authorities have been detaining individuals for civil violations, such as illegal entry, and sending them to Guantanamo, where they face indefinite detention (CBS News, 2025).

​

Reports suggest that while some detainees have violent criminal histories or are suspected gang members, many are being held for non-violent immigration offenses. Federal guidelines define "low-risk" detainees as individuals who have not been arrested or convicted for serious crimes but are facing deportation orders due to their undocumented status (CBS News, 2025). The government's decision to house these individuals in a maximum-security military prison, rather than in civilian detention centers, further exacerbates concerns about the legality and fairness of this approach.

​

International Criticism and Legal Precedents

The relocation of undocumented immigrants to Guantanamo has raised not only constitutional concerns but also international legal issues. The detention of individuals at Guantanamo Bay without trial violates principles established under international human rights law, including the prohibition on arbitrary detention. The United Nations has previously criticized the U.S. for its use of indefinite detention at Guantanamo, and human rights organizations argue that sending immigrants to the base further undermines the U.S.'s commitment to upholding international law (United Nations, 2025).

​

Furthermore, the detention of low-risk, non-violent migrants at Guantanamo contradicts the U.S. government's stated goal of removing dangerous criminals from the country. By sending individuals with little or no criminal history to the facility, the administration risks violating both domestic and international laws by treating immigrants as security threats without justification.

​

Conclusion

The use of Guantanamo Bay to detain undocumented immigrants, including both violent gang members and low-risk individuals, is a troubling development in the U.S.'s immigration policy. The lack of transparency, limited access to legal counsel, and potential violations of constitutional and international law raise serious questions about the fairness and legality of this practice. As legal challenges continue to mount, it is clear that the debate over Guantanamo’s role in immigrant detention will have significant implications for the future of U.S. immigration policy and the protection of basic human rights.

​

Citations

1. ProPublica, "U.S. Claims Immigrants Held at Guantanamo Are 'Worst of the Worst.' Their Families Say They’re Being Unfairly Targeted," February 13, 2025.

2. CBS News, "Low-risk Migrants Also Sent to Guantanamo Bay, Raising Alarm Over Use of Facility," February 12, 2025.

3. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), "ACLU Sues Over Trump Administration’s Use of Guantanamo to Detain Immigrants," February 2025.

4. United Nations, "U.S. Detention Practices and Guantanamo Bay: A Violations of International Human Rights Law," 2025.